The second reading of Karen Buck MP’s Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability for Housing Standards) Bill is on January 19th 2018.
We can hardly believe that, in the 6th richest country in the world, in 2018 it is necessary for such a bill to be raised.
It is astonishing that such a protection is not already in existence for tenants. Tenants have no avenue for redress or means of compelling landlords to make repairs or even secure the safety of the property.
The Bill would empower tenants by giving them the right to take their landlord to court if they fail to take action to resolve a problem.
There are currently around one million rented homes with hazards that pose a serious risk to health and safety. This affects over 2.5 million people.
You might think that this lapse in the law is an oversight that just needs to be rectified. But you would be mistaken.
A version of the Bill was first introduced by Karen Buck in 2015 and was ‘talked out’. A version of the Bill was also proposed as an amendment to the Housing and Planning Act 2016 and was voted down by the government. Including the 87 Tory MPs who are landlords. Their argument was that such legislation would burden upon landlords and discourage people from renting out homes.
How did we get in the situation we are in today, one might ask.
Many years of under funding and de regulation of the housing market we could argue.
What could be a greater burden for any person than trying to live in a ‘home’ unfit for human habitation, you might wonder.
Data from the English Housing Survey 2017 found that Almost a third (29 per cent) of homes rented from private landlords fail to meet the national Decent Homes Standard; meaning they either contain safety hazards or do not have acceptable kitchen and bathroom facilities or adequate heating
Poor housing impacts on children by making them 25% more at risk of ill health or disability, including raised risk of meningitis or asthma and a greater chance of mental health issues.
They are also more likely to miss school through illness. Almost one million privately rented homes are deemed to be in a state of “substantial disrepair”, while 442,000 have damp in one of more rooms.
Poor housing also places a greater burden on other services and affects society as a whole, not just children.
Substantially more working age adults living in bad housing report fair, bad or very bad general health (26%) than those living in good housing (17%), with adults in bad housing 26% more likely to report low mental health compared with those living in good housing.
Those living in bad housing are almost twice as likely to have their sleep disturbed by respiratory problems at least once a month.
The association between living in bad housing and health problems is particularly acute among those above retirement age; with Pensioners in bad housing a third more likely to have fair, bad or very bad health compared with those in good housing (58% vs 38%).
Almost a fifth (19%) suffer from low mental health compared with 11% in good housing.
Almost twice as many pensioners living in bad housing suffer from wheezing in the absence of a cold, compared with those in good housing.
Not only is this unacceptable and immoral in this day and age but it also undoubtedly places more burden on the cash strapped NHS, including mental health services and schools that are already under so much pressure.
So what can we do about this?
We welcome the second reading of the bill and hope that this can proceed to the next stage. MPs will have a vote on this issue and we the people can apply pressure on our local MPs to vote the right way.
You can find who your local MP is and and how to contact them by clicking on the link below.
The above is taken from Natcen’s 2013 report on People in bad housing.
One thought on “Isn’t It Time We Made Homes Fit For Human Habitation? By Kelly Grehan and Lisa Mulholland”